Read this

Ok, so I don’t post here as much as I would like to, that being said I did feel the need to share this with everyone.  From Paul Adams at Google:

Categories: Uncategorized

On Multitasking, Integrated Social Accounts, and the Future

April 28, 2010 1 comment

I know, a very heady and timely topic for someone that posts as infrequently as I do. I’ve been a little pre-occupied with my Twitter steam and ignoring this blog, but hopefully that will change and I’ll be back to some semblance of weekly posting again soon.

Anyway…

In the past few weeks there have been two big mobile OS announcements, and both of them have featured (at least publicly) the same thing.  Both Apple’s new OS4 and RIM’s new Blackberry 6 feature touch-interface based multitasking as well as integrated social networking accounts. Of course there were other things in Steve Jobs’ 7 pillars and BB seems to be focusing on appealing to a younger demographic, but as far as consumers are concerned, multitasking and social integration are the big steps forward.

Those of you that follow me on Twitter (or have just glanced at the stream on the right) no doubt know about my feelings on these “innovations” from Apple and RIM. Simply put, Android has been doing multitasking out of the gate and Motorola has this great little UI called Motoblur that does an amazing job of social integration. I won’t go into depth here about those two, other than to say that I love my Cliq XT simply because it handles both multitasking and integration so well, and all this before the Android 2.1 upgrade scheduled for this quarter!

What I’d really like to note here is that the adoption of these features by Apple and RIM (in addition to the Facebook announcements from F8 last week) should mean great things for the inter-connectivity of the web. The thing that I love about the integrated social accounts on the Cliq XT is that it allows me to have a true snapshot of my life. If you looked at my old phone, you would assume that I’m a recluse that orders a whole lot of take-out (nearly 30% of my phone book was dedicated to delivery joints in my neighborhood). Now when I look at my phone I see all of my work and personal contacts with an option on how to contact those that blur the boundaries.

Allowing people to feel connected (and indeed reflected) by their hardware will, in the long term provide a greater incentive for sharing and web usage, which is exactly what applications (like Facebook and Twitter) and cloud-based services like Google and now Microsoft want. This is also crucial information for marketers and advertisers to keep in mind.

Both the mobile and social spaces will continue to expand exponentially in the next 2-3 years (I include tablets in the mix here, since I see them more as mobile computing devices than a replacement for the desktop). Mobile gaming and location-based services should be in the front of mind when looking to emerging and new technology. Same with QR and AR, especially if Motorola continues to move forward in 3D tech for mobiles.

These are just a few suggestions for people and agencies to keep in mind when it comes to the utilization of next gen tech. What you do with it is of course entirely up to you.

Consumers don’t even trust consumers anymore

February 8, 2010 Leave a comment

Very interesting article from AdAge today on the results of Edelman‘s recently released Trust Barometer. According to Edelman consumer trust has dropped significantly in the 2009, with trust among friends and peers falling from 45% in 2008 to 25% in 2009. When asked about a “person like yourself”, namely a blogger, or average people in testemonials, the percentages from from 45% to 39%.

Interestingly though, consumer trust in CEO’s had a year over year increase from 17 – 26%.

According to AdAge, “People have caught on to the fact marketers are increasingly behind that influential blog post or tweet. Despite regulations regarding disclosure of marketer-driven efforts, consumers may feel that whatever it is these people are receiving from companies positively influences their endorsements.”

What does this mean to those of us who use digital media as a marketing communications tool? Has our field gotten the better of us where we are no longer able to rely on WOM from bloggers?

Perhaps one solution to this situation is to pull an idea from “The Great Schlep”, the highly successful social media campaign starring Sara Silverman, and look instead to target those who influence our decision makers. \

WOM continues to be a strong tool, but it is necessary for marketers to remain nimble when crafting a campaign and look to not only the end consumer, but also to those who influence that consumer. Look to the children, grandchildren, co-workers, etc… as an additional tool for reaching your demographic.

Most importantly, be honest with your consumers. In this day and age if there is something that can come out and bite you it will.Toyota found that out the hard way, learn from their mistakes.

Establish trust on all levels and you’ll be building the foundation for generations of brand loyal consumers.

Categories: Advertising, Marketing, new Tags:

Adidas takes a turn on the AR bandwagon

January 26, 2010 1 comment

Augmented Reality Turns Shoes Into Game Controllers

I’ll give serious credit to Adidas for embracing the technology and including AR codes on the tongue of a new line of footwear, but somebody really dropped the ball here, or at least wasn’t thinking things through.  How many people are going to want to use a shoe that’s been on the ground, subway or the candy/popcorn/soda soaked floor of a movie theater as a game controller?

Perhaps a better option for Adidas would have been to sew two AR tags to the cuffs of a sweater, long-sleeved T, or jacket.  Then have the AR code access a series of games that would tie in with Adidas’ various markets.  Have a choice of a Need for Speed: Underground style game for youth, a boxing game to target their boxing/mma demographic and perhaps even tie in with Chevy with a Dale Jr. Nascar driving simulation.

It’s not just about embracing the technology and showing that you’re “young” and “hip”.  The technology should be used to reinforce existing brand identity.

Posted using ShareThis

Is Yelp Growing Up?

January 25, 2010 Leave a comment

Coming hot on the launch of a new check-in function on it’s iPhone app, neighborhood ratings giant Yelp is looking to attract private investment in a plan similar to Facebook and Google’s past pre-IPO dutch auction style funding cycle.

Given that Yelp’s new service fared well in Mashable’s latest Face-Off, coming in second to segment leader Foursquare (which has been in the news quite a bit in recent weeks), does this mean that a more Professional Yelp is in the works?

Categories: Uncategorized

New York Times Website May Charge: Will You Pay? [Mashable POLL]

January 18, 2010 Leave a comment

Really NYT?  Are we really doing this again? People are not only accustomed to free news content, they expect it.  Unless you have a very defined niche (see WSJ) pay for news doesn’t work.  Any news organization that will be competing with the NYTimes will see an instant increase in online readership when/if the NYT goes forward with a pay plan.

I understand that the revenue from online ad sales do and will not make up for the loss of revenue from traditional print advertising.  Print publications need to look towards the expanding possibilities presented by e-readers.  CES this year featured a nearly endless supply of new readers from traditional emerging tech companies such as Aesus to entrenched traditional companies such as Barnes and Noble (with an new/update to the Nook).

People expect for the news to be free, that’s not about to change.  However, people are willing to pay for a service that will make accessing that news easier.  A news outlet would be able to charge individuals to have items constantly updated on a reader, especially if it has the opportunity to present itself in a traditional format.

New York Times Website May Charge: Will You Pay? [POLL]

Posted using ShareThis

B&N does it right

October 20, 2009 Leave a comment

Well, Barnes and Noble has officially released it’s new e-book reader, The Nook, and it looks like they’re the first to really grab a hold of all of the facets of book ownership. In addition to an attractive pricepoint ($259 usd), it includes integrated 3g and wifi (although the 3g is from ATT, not my personal favorite T-Mobile). But really, as far as I’m concerned the real innovation here, the real reason that this particular reader is noteworthy in an increasingly flooded market is the ability for peer-to-peer book sharing. And the best part is that the sharing is irrespective of device:

You can share nook to nook, but it doesn’t stop there. Using the new Barnes & Noble LendMe™ technology… you will be able to lend to and from any iPhone™, iPod touch®, BlackBerry®, PC, or Mac®, with the free Barnes and Noble eReader software downloaded on it. – via BN.com

Finally, the missing link in readers, the social aspect of reading (well at least until flexible OLED becomes a consumer reality, then we’ll get to the really fun stuff). And B&N will do well to continue marketing the Nook based on that social element. Book sharing is a time honored tradition in most families and social circles. The Nook makes it even better, since the book is automatically “returned” when the 14 days are up. No more bothering your 80 year old aunt Mildred for that copy of Anna Karenina you loaned her 4 years ago.

Combined with the ability to scribble notes in the margins, there is little left to distinguish ebooks from their traditional counterparts (that being said, I’ll always enjoy reading a physical book).

Good job B&N.  This should be good.

Netbooks, MID’s, and the future of the mobile internet

August 18, 2009 Leave a comment

Not too long ago, the mobile internet was a poorly rendered WAP version of the real deal. This didn’t bother me too much, as I still remember AOL on a 386. But for those who don’t remember the mid 90′s and the glory of being able to click a link then go make a sandwich and pour yourself a glass of iced tea before making your way back to the computer to find your new page still loading, this was a major problem. Laptops are fine and dandy, but really that’s still a fairly sizable machine you’re hauling around, not ideal for web surfing/portable email/applications. With the move to smartphones came a move to a proper internet, or at least a scaled version of the internet. Now, we finally have real browsers that allow for a decent internet viewing on BlackBerry, iPhone, HTC and other cell phones. But all, and I mean all, of those solutions don’t really give you the full internet. Pages are rendered properly of course, but most are scaled down to a smaller resolution to fit on the smaller screen.

Netbooks and MID’s solve that problem. Both are portable (obviously MID’s are more portable than netbooks) and both allow for a full resolution webpage to be viewed. This becomes important in the world of social networking as it allows us to become entrenched in the process of managing our online personas. What exactly do I mean by that? As we get to the point that technology allows for a universal internet, with things looing the same and with the user experience, the more fluid our actions on social networking sites will become. This will result in the experience becoming more finely ingrained in our daily life. After all, it wasn’t too long ago that you couldn’t check your email on the beach at all.

Hyperlocal News? As long as it’s professional.

July 15, 2009 Leave a comment

CNN.com has a wonderful piece on the emergence of “hyperlocal” news organizations. Thinking about the rise of focused, local news organizations certainly makes me happy, much like thinking about the farmers market at Grand Army Plaza makes me hungry. Certainly this can be a great boon to not only local news outlets (which, lets be honest, need it), but also to general knowledge around the world. The advent of wiki’s and truly mobile computing (Blackberry, iPhone, etc…) has turned everyone into a expert on everything. Many years ago when I was graduating from high school my guidance council had some trouble giving me a good recommendation for college because I was a “renaissance man” in his mind. I knew a lot about a whole lot of things, but I had no real advantage in any field. Wiki’s have compunded this problem into an international issue, with a general knowledge of almost everything made available at the push of a button (at a recent night out we used Wikipedia to remember the villains from several Hanna Barbera cartoons). Of course the problem with this knowledge is that it’s never completely trustworthy. Wikipedia and the like can be edited by anyone with internet access, and has been shown as a result to be easy to tamper with. History is certainly written by the winners, but facts are facts and should remain so. This is why it is still inadmissible to use a wiki as a source in a publishable paper of any kind.

So what exactly am I getting at here? While I’m excited about the possibility of an increase in hyperlocal news organizations such as chitowndailynews.org Id’ like to echo the sentiments of Jane McDonnell, the executive director of the Online News Association. “…there’s less journalistic oversight over what is being disseminated and distributed and created.” So basically news outlets will turn into wiki’s. This is the danger that these hyperlocal outlets create. Journalists go through school and training to prevent (or at least try to) the distribution of un-sourced, unreliable news. My greatest fear is that these organizations will reduce newspapers to wiki’s (and who will kids quote in school papers then?).

Personally, I like aggregators like Everyblock. Sourcing established news outlets (both local and national) as well as government agencies (again, both local and national), seems to be the best and most reliable way to generate hyperlocal news. Of course that’s just what I think. In the end, I fear, that this will be decided by money and if hyperlocal news organizations are the wave of the future, I can only hope that they are well staffed and well trained.

Digital Piracy or Missed Opportunities?

February 5, 2009 Leave a comment

Today’s NYTimes brings up an interesting problem facing the film industry that I had been meaning to talk about. An article titled Digital Pirates Winning Battle with Studios brings to light the challenge that at one time faced the music industry in the guise of Napster and other peer-to-peer services and is now being faced with by the film/television industry. While the music industry faltered by limiting access to digital content before allowing for legal options, the film and television industry is already making headway by posting content online (particularly television). Just look at NBC or ABC for good examples of how to share content with viewers. Or look at the tremendous job that Monty Pyton has done with posting free content on YouTube rather than pursuing expensive (and often pointless) litigation.

Digital piracy is going to happen. People are going to steal copies of movies and television programs no matter what the stuidos do, unless they stop making movies all together. So let’s look at this in a fresh light. Why not take this opportunity to do some positive PR and ad some advertising revenue to the budget? Studios should provide BitTorrent sites with officially liscensed versions of their movies, but throw some advertising in before the movie. Moviegoers have obviously accepted this in the theater (just try going to a movie today without seeing an ad for Pepsi, or the National Guard), so why not extend the reach to the internet. Television studios are alredy doing this (see the above mentioned sites), and according to the article “Heroes” is being downloaded at an average of 5 million downloads per episode. So why not sell that ad space? True they can be skipped over, but the ads in the theater can be ignored and those on the DVD can be skipped completely in some instances.

It seems to me that this could be a great positive all around. Studios will see increase ad revenue and exposure, while basking in the glow of positive word of mouth. BitTorrent websites will be able to sleep at night and see increase viewership. Brands will get their message out to a new audience. And consumers will have another option for viewing.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.